Tampilkan postingan dengan label Assignment. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label Assignment. Tampilkan semua postingan

Minggu, 29 Mei 2011

Extensive Reading Journal Part VI By Endha Blog

Extensive Reading: from graded to authentic text

Andrew Barfield


Abstract

This paper looks at extensive reading for first-year unversity English courses. A basic methodological distinction is drawn between intensive reading and extensive reading, and the different phases of a working extensive reading programme are described. After reporting on some classroom research and student data, questions of strategy training and bridging techniques are addressed. In this, broader connections are made to applied linguistic research, before conclusions are drawn.

Key words: extensive reading; graded readers; reading confidence; reading fluency; reading journals; student documentation; time management; development of reader elaborations; interpretive skills; reader response strategies; paraphrasing; mind-mapping; discourse pattern awareness; local lexical relationships.

1.0 Introduction

What kind of reading experience have first-year students of English had in their pre-university education? The following (unreformulated) learning history from an Art and Design student is fairly typical of what students go through in Junior High and Senior High:

[Junior High School]
In the third year, the substance of the lesson is grammar, grasping the content of the textbook and reading it smoothly. I go to my teacher to have her hear my reading. If I can read the textbook by heart, she gives me marks.

[Senior High School]
Then I entered a high school. We had two kinds of English class, "reading class" and "grammar class". The content of the textbook becomes to be difficult. The vocabularies are rich and complicated. On every Tuesday we have the English test. It was said it "Weekly test" ... In the first year of the high school it was written examinations and mark. My school class emphasized grammar and grasping the content of the sentences.

Striking elements of this pre-university experience include memorization; reading aloud; reading difficult text; sentence-level comprehension; weekly tests. Given the nature of the university entrance examination in Japan, it is neither surprising nor particularly remarkable that many students come to university as slow readers of English who use word-by-word translation and who lack confidence in reading in a foreign language. These are hardly, though, the characteristic skills of a fluent reader. How can we help students become more fluent readers of English? One part of the answer may lie in including extensive reading as a core component of first-year English courses.

2.0 Extensive reading in contrast to other types of reading

What is extensive reading? Reading has traditionally been divided into two types: intensive and extensive. In broad terms, intensive reading may be described as the practice of particular reading skills and the close linguistic study of text. Extensive reading, on the other hand, can be defined as reading a large quantity of text, where reading confidence and reading fluency are prioritised. Although this twin categorization of reading into two basic types can be found in many teacher resource books for the teaching of English as a foreign language (Grellet:1981, Nuttall:1982, for example), it is not the whole story, as the student's learning history clearly pointed out. We need to extend the categorization. We can do this by adding, first, oral reading (Day:1993), or reading aloud in class, where considerable focus is put on correct pronunciation of the text - and, second, text translation, where correct translation of the foreign language text into the learners' mother tongue is emphasized in tandem with the study of an array of grammatical, lexical and phonological points. This creates a four-way methodological categorization of reading in a foreign language, summarised in the following table.

 
        methodological choice          classroom focus

        Extensive                            students read a lot of text
        Intensive                             students practise particular reading skills
        oral reading                         students listen and read aloud
        text translation                   students translate from L2 to L1

     
Table 1 Basic Classroom Approaches to Reading in a Foreign Language
 

3.0 Objectives in extensive reading in the first term

With regard to the first term of a first-year English reading course at Tsukuba University, 'reading a lot of text' centres on the use of graded readers so that the students read or are involved in reading-related activities for most of each lesson. It also means that the students spend at least one hour a week outside class reading. This principle of independent reading informs the course objectives in the first term. These are:

  • to increase student confidence in their English reading ability
  • to increase student motivation in their English reading
  • to increase student reading fluency, specifically
    • to decrease dependence on word by word comprehension
    • to increase reading speed (number of pages read per hour)
  • to increase student narrative interpreting ability, specifically so that students
    • identify and record key/interesting points in a narrative
    • write and discuss in English their own ideas and opinions about what has been read, and their own reading progress
  • to foster a clear, strong and constant sense of personal success in reading English

As the course progresses through the second and third terms of the year, these objectives hold still true, but are elaborated and become specific, as will be shown later in this paper. Let us turn our attention now to actual classroom procedures in the first term.

4.0 Classroom organisation of extensive reading

In the real world, we exercise choice over the books that we read: we browse through different titles when we go into libraries and bookshops; we take time to choose something of personal interest to ourselves. The same is true when learners use a class library for extensive reading. Let us look at one example in detail.

Class library content

In this instance, for a class of 40+ students (1), in the summer term, the class library consists of 180 books or so. Most are graded readers written within certain controlled vocabulary limits and specifically produced for learners of English. Some are higher level readers especially targeted at native speaker teenagers, while others consist of readers written especially for native speaker children. For the most part, the books are about fifty pages long, and include illustrations and drawings. All of the titles involve narrative stories - from simplified versions of classics like A Tale of Two Cities, Sherlock Holmes and Alice in Wonderland to biographies of Martin Luther King and Mother Teresa; science fiction; adventure stories; love stories; thrillers, and so on. In short, the class library contains an interesting and wide variety of books written at easily accessible levels of English.

Level of reading materials

In terms of level, the books are divided into four bands: green, blue, red and yellow. Green is roughly equivalent to elementary level (upto the 1000 headword level); blue approximates to pre-intermediate (between 1000 and 1500 headwords), red to intermediate (1500 to 2000 headwords), and yellow to intermediate plus (2000 headwords plus). Each book is colour-coded as well as number coded for its level (100.0?? for green, for example, and 400.0?? for yellow), and has a book ticket within a pocket on the inside back cover (2).

Reading and note-taking requirements

In the first term, students are required to read 750 pages, over the course of ten weeks (3). They are also requested to buy an English-English learner's dictionary, Collins Cobuild Student Dictionary. When the students read books from the library, they are required to keep a reading journal. This is a B5 notebook in which they are asked to record in English: double-entry key points/reflection notes; reading performance reviews; weekly reading goals; book reports; half-term and end-of-term self-assessments. (See 6.0 Student Documentation for more detail.)

Using the library

Students can check out of the library up to two books at any one time at the start of the term; this is subsequently increased to three books later in the term after their reading speed has picked up. To check out a book, students write the title, code and date checked out on an individual A4 reading record sheet, as well as indicate the number of pages in the book. A maximum of six students can use the library at a go. While some students are use the library, the rest read, discuss in pairs what they have read, or make notes in their book journal (4).

5.0 Profile of a typical extensive reading lesson

The focus throughout the first term is on fluent reading. Since this is the overriding aim, most phases of the 75-minute lesson are organised to nurture this. Thus, the first part of the lesson - social English - involves the students standing up face-to-face in pairs and holding free conversations in English for a couple of minutes with one or two different people. This helps the students to switch into English for the lesson, and to create good group dynamics at the start of the lesson. Next, the students are asked to focus their attention on what they have achieved in their reading that week. This phase of the lesson involves the students in pairs first asking and answering, then writing questions such as:

  • What book(s) did you read this week?
  • What did you find particularly interesting?
  • How many pages did you read?
  • How much time did you spend reading?
  • What are your reading goals this week?

After this, the students turn their tables face-to-face in pairs, and using the notes they have made during the last week on what they have been reading, they report to their partner and discuss their books in more detail with each other. During this phase, the reading record sheets are given out, and students start using the library. While some students are browsing and choosing books, the rest of the class (a) continues its pair discussions, or (b) reads, or (c) make notes. If students have finished (a), (b) or (c), they are free to talk in English - with occasional encouragement - until they can go to the front of the class and use the library. Finally, the reading record sheets are collected in before the whole class is taken through a relaxation and visualisation sequence. These fluency phases are summarised in the following table.

 
     lesson phase                   what the students do

     social English                 in pairs, they hold free conversations

     reading performance       in pairs, they talk about their reading that week
        review: spoken

     reading performance       individually, they write about their reading that week
        review: written            in their reading journal

     book discussion               in pairs, they use their reading journal notes from their
                                             out-of-class reading to talk about their books; reading
                                             record sheets are given out to the students

     reading                            individually, they read

     note-taking                     individually, they make notes

     library                             individually, they use the class library

     reading record sheets      reading record sheets are collected in

     relaxation/visualisation  the whole class is taken through a relaxation sequence,
                                             and led to visualise a positive and peaceful week ahead

      
Table 2 Lesson phases in extensive reading in the first term
 

6.0 Student Documentation

Throughout the term, the students are required to document their reading in different ways. Such documentation provides ample material for the teacher to assess each student's individual achievement over the term, as well as enables the students not only to record their ideas and responses but also to see their own progress for themselves.

Reading journal double-entries (5)

As the students read their books, they keep notes in the following fashion. On the left-hand page of their reading journal, they copy important and/or interesting sentences from the text. On the right-hand page, they select three or four entries from the left-hand page and write their personal response to each of them. Some unreformulated examples of this would be (taken in isolation from different reading journals):

Left-hand page in reading Right-hand page in reading
journal: from the text journal: from the student
 
'Wake up, Alice dear!' she said.              I don't like stories which finishes
 'What a long sleep you've had!'              with the words 'All of this story was
 (from Alice in Wonderland)                  only a dream,' because I think it is the
                                                             author's escape from the finish of the
                                                             story.  But only about this story, I
                                                             thought it had a different meaning. I
                                                             like a way of finish in this story.
 
Some of the visitors were nice to        This shows how important the money
me, but the others did not notice         and position is. This still exist today in
me. I was too poor and unimportant.     company and other various places. In
(from Jane Eyre)                                  Japan, along with position and money,
                                                             there is age. This is becoming problem, 
                                                             because young people are not being able to
                                                             do what they want because of it.
 
From his head down to his shoes          It's very good expression. I can
one could see that he was a kind          imagine that there is finely dressed
and sensible person, a real                   gentleman, but he is very angly, and
gentleman. But his face no longer         I feel good observation of Dr Watson,
looked sensible or happy. His hair         too.
was standing up and his face was
red and angry. (from Sherlock
Holmes: His Last Bow)
 
            
Table 3 Example reading journal double entries
 

Such notes provide the basis for pair book discussions, where a natural information gap exists because each student is reading a different book. Of course, not all student double-entries are like this, a point that will be discussed further in 7.0 Questions and limits.

Reading performance reviews

These reviews are done on a weekly basis. The students record in their reading journals how many pages they have read; how much time they have spent reading; what their story was about; what their reading goals are now for the next week. The following two unreformulated reviews from the same student show a typical jump in both reading fluency and confidence within a few weeks:

May 16 1995
 
1. 21 pages
2. About one hour
3. I felt that Frankenstein is the sad story. A monster can't speak and make friends, 
   so it's very pity. If Frankenstein fear it, he shouldn't give its life again.
4. I would like to read through it and other book.
 
June 6 1995
 
1. 121 pages
2. About two hours
3. 'Hansel and Gretel'  I had ever heard this story's name. But I didn't know this 
   story, so I could enjoy reading this book. I felt that Hansel and Gretel are very 
   sadly. Their parents left them in the wood. But they became to be happy at last. 
   So I felt that it was very good.
4. Last week I could read many pages. So it was good. Graduately I can become to read 
fast. I would like to read two books.
 
            
Table 4 Example reading performance reviews
 

Weekly reading goals

These are incorporated in the performance review, as a way of nurturing a positive attitude to reading in terms of a plan-perform-reflect-plan learning cycle. At this stage in the course, this goal setting remains general in many cases without any particular support strategies being articulated. That is, students can express personal learning goals, but do not yet identify specific actions by which they can achieve such goals. Other commonly expressed goals in the first term include: wanting to read more quickly; guessing words from context / imaging.

Book reports

Students can be asked to write summaries and reports about the books that they read. This can be done as a regular activity, or left to the end of term. There are many possibilities here for integrating the skills further: see Greenwood 1992 and Hedge 1984 for further suggestions. On the one hand, such reports provide one assessment tool for the teacher; on the other hand, they indirectly enable the students to review and recycle key ideas and vocabulary from what they read.

Mid-term reports

It is important to be able to determine how students are coping, and which students may be in need of extra guidance. This can be done through collecting in mid-term reading reports. Students who are below a cumulative total of 250 pages by the end of May will probably have difficulty in reaching the term goal. With these students, I usually arrange group tutorials, where we review together what each person has been doing; discuss ways to improve reading speed and time management; plan how many pages a week each student is going to try and read from then until the end of term. Part of an example mid-term reading report is reproduced below:

Show in the graph the total number of pages that you have read each week:

Figure 1 Example mid-term reading report rubric

End-of-term self-assessments

This is a one-page report written by the students in response to the following questions:

1. What is the total number of pages that you have read this term?
2. What was the most interesting book that you read? Why?
3. How do you think your reading has changed this term?
4. What are your personal goals from now on?
5. What are your reading goals from now on?

This report provides a summary for the teacher to make a subjective judgement of each student's achievement in a preliminary evaluation. Some example end-of-term self-assessments are included in the following table (6).

 
Student A                              Student B                             Student C
611 pages                             603 pages                             594 pages

A Town Like Alice                 Riders of the Purple Sage     Mother Teresa

This book is very serious     I could know the lifestyle     Because I have seen
story. So I have thought       of riders.                               Mother Teresa and had
many things. I haven't                                                        been interested in her.
looked the war, but I 
studied about the war 
from this book. 

First, I read Blue or Green   First, I could find some         I have been able to read
book. But at final, I lend      interest points, but I could   the book in English by
Red or Yellow books.            hardly express my feelings   reading it in English in
                                            or opinions. Now, graduary    my head.
                                            I can express my own 
                                            feeling. That's a great 
                                            progress for me.

I want to speak English in    Continue to talk in English.   100% in English at this
daily life.                             And I try to talk in English    class.

                                             in this class and read 
                                             English books about design.

I read 600 pages for one      I'm going to read books          I want to read English
term. So I will read 1800    about "design". Especially I    books as Japanese books.
 pages for one year.             love cars so I will read                        
                                           about car design books.

 
Table 5 Example end-of-term self-assessments
 

The end-of-term self-assessment reports can also be analysed to see in what ways the students align their own progress with the course objectives. Of 32 reports collected at the time of writing this article, the following benefits were mentioned:

Benefits of extensive reading Number of %
as perceived by the students mentions


     increased reading speed                            27                             84.5%
     better comprehension                               11                              34% 
     reading enjoyment                                    11                              34%
Table 6 Student perceptions of changes in their reading at the end of the first term

Reading journal

To read through a student's reading journal at the end of a ten-week term takes time for a class of over 40 students, but this is time well spent in understanding each student's achievement during the term and in gaining insights into different aspects of the students' learning. Some examples follow in the next section.

7.0 Questions and limits

Before looking at ways of bridging the gap between graded and authentic text, let us look at some questions that arise from using graded readers. These questions can help both identify limits and provide a rationale for second and third term course content.

Time

How much time is needed for extensive reading to succeed? Given the constraints (30 @ 75-minute lessons in one academic year for reading, with one lesson a week in each term), students must clearly spend substantial time outside class doing reading for an extensive reading programme in this context to work. A reasonable minimum weekly requirement would be between one and two hours outside class. From reading through the journals of four 'failing' students, we can see better why the question of time on task is so important:

Student A( reading total: 280 pages)

This student read six books and started off with detailed left-hand/right-hand page notes, but then left her journal blank from May 21st to June 25th.

Student B (reading total: 440 pages)

This student read eight books and made detailed left-hand/right-hand page notes throughout. He commented in his end-of-term self-assessment:

'I at first tried to read fluently from a word to a word. Every time I saw the unknown words I used my dictionary. It took long time. But gradually if there are a few words which I don't understand in the story I become to read not being anxious for them.'

Student C (reading total: 443 pages)

This student read six books, and kept very brief notes.

Student D (reading total: 456 pages)

This student read seven books and kept detailed left-hand/right-hand page notes. She commented in her end-of-term self-assessment:

'First I hated to read English books because I thought I couldn't understand them, but now I like reading them better than before. I became to be able to understand graduary.'

In the case of students A and C , time management (7) seems to be the key factor. This also seems to be partly true for student B, in the sense that he took a long time to switch from the inefficient strategy of word by word comprehension towards a more confident fluency-based approach. As for student D, again time seems to play a role, but, more importantly, she has gone through an important affective and/or attitudinal change to reading in English. Here, we may tentatively conclude that taking enough time to read is critical. We can also underline again the important role that out-of-class support tutorials (8) can play.

Control of text structure/patterning

Is a sole focus on narrative genre in the form of graded readers sufficient or not, where the stated goals of the first-year university curriculum are to prepare students for reading academic text in English in the field of their majors? In a small-scale piece of classroom research, carried out in June 1996, students were asked to read 8-10 pages of an intermediate-level graded reader and then to write a summary in English of what they had read. They had 35 minutes in which to do this. The opening of the story included characters profiles and four distinct episodes - that is, events set in different places, with different combinations of characters in each episode and different problem-resolutions. Of 39 written recalls,

  • 2 failed to summarise any episode at all
  • 5 summarised one episode plus part of a second
  • 6 students summarised two episodes plus part of a third
  • 17 students summarised three episodes plus part of a fourth
  • 9 students sumarised all four episodes.

In addition, students who in their summaries reproduced the narrative sequence and structure of the original text managed to achieve two other interesting features too: first, they also included more supporting detail to the main episodes; second, they showed better comprehension of the story's events, characters and their interrelationship than other students. From this, we can tentatively conclude that reading performance can (and needs to) be improved through explicit attention to text structure/patterning (9).

Elaborations of personal interpretations

In what ways do students develop their interpretive skills through double-entry journal writing? There seem to be at least three major stages in the development of such fundamental critical thinking (10). In the first stage, the student is able to give an opinion, but does not support it in any manner:

He did not know who his mother                He was very sad person.
was, for she had died soon after
his birth. (Oliver Twist)

In the second stage, the student is able to give an opinion, and can give an additional comment:

The ship, the hero and his family              In the vast sea, to find an island
who went on board had the storm             is very difficult. I think the hero
for almost a week, and at last it              and his family was very fortunate.
struck a rock and began to sink.  
So, they took shelter from the ship 
by the boat. Then they found an 
island which had mountains and 
green forests. (Swiss Family 
Robinson)

In the third stage, the student is able to give an opinion and comment, and make a higher level connection (cause-effect, comparision, contrast, for example):

I can't remember the last time I             He found he was really a human 
ate something. Listen to those                and humans were really animals. 
They are hungry too, of course.               I thought he was killed by wolves  
I'm an animal just like them.                  as their meal, and he accepted it.  
(The Year of Sharing)                            In the last page, Richard's mother  
                                                               said that he learnt to share and 
                                                               that the world belongs not just to 
                                                               people, but to animals, and we 
                                                               must all learn it. That is all I 
                                                               learned in this book. 

Further investigation of this development might well lead to finer distinctions being made, much along the lines of Vygotskian theory (11). What is important here, though, in terms of the organisation of extensive reading is the intimate bond between reading and oral/written expression as a means to developing interpreting ability, and the evidence once again of reading as a developmental process that involves much more than just conventional knowledge of grammar and vocabulary.

Reader response as a basis for teaching decisions

What strategies do students use, after a term of extensive reading, when they read a text and meet words and phrases they do not understand? In a small-scale investigation, 40 students were asked to read a newspaper article, and note down on the left-hand page of their reading journals any parts of the text which they couldn't understand, and on the right-hand page what action they decided to take at that point. Three strategies proved of roughly equal popularity:

  • guessing from context (33%)
  • checking in an English-English dictionary (28%)
  • skipping and continuing to read (27%).

This is interesting in that the students used efficient reading strategies without having been explicitly trained in them, and that they have moved away from translation as a primary strategy. In this regard, Smith (1985:65) notes for L1 readers:

The identification of every word is not necessary for comprehension to take place. On the contrary, stopping to try and figure out every unfamiliar word the moment it is encountered serves only to produce tunnel vision and overload short-term memory. Comprehension is bound to be lost in such circumstances and learning becomes impossible. The tendency to stop dead at the first difficult word and thus to struggle uncomprehendingly through print a word at a time is a characteristic of poor readers of all ages.

Of course, with L2 readers, the L1 is a constant potential resource; Widdowson, for example, argues in favour of the initial parts of text being given in the L1 so that readers find a way into more efficient interpretation of L2 communicative use, or discourse-to-discourse gradual approximation (Widdowson (1988): 18, 159). The point is, though, that this is by no means the same as either equating reading with complete translation of a text or the use of word-by-word translation.

As for variations in reading strategies, the following points can be noted:

  • 60% used multiple reading strategies (a combination of skipping, dictionary and guessing);
  • 17.5% used just one strategy throughout (of which 12.5% mentioned English-English dictionaries; 2.5% skipping and continuing to read; 2.5% guessing);
  • 22.5% mentioned no strategy at all.

At a minimum level, then, we could conclude that interpretive reading skills can be improved through early, explicit training in using simultaneously the three strategies previously mentioned, as Widdowson (1978: 85) points out:

... reading is not simply a matter of correlating words as they occur in context with their dictionary signification but of creating value by the process of active interpreting.

8.0 Review and wider connections

We have seen how classroom research and student data enable us to understand reading as a continuous and multi-faceted process of interaction between lower level interpetive skills, such as contextualised guessing, and higher level interpretive skills, such as global text awareness and critical analysis. This accords with the Vygotskian theory of the ebb and flow between everyday and scientific concepts in cognitive development (Vygotsky (1934): 194):

Though scientific and spontaneous concepts develop in reverse directions, the two processes are closely connected. The development of a spontaneous concept must have reached a certain level for the child to be able to absorb a related scientific concept ... In working its slow way upward, an everyday concept clears a path for the scientific concept and its downward development. It creates a series of structures necessary for the evolution of a concept's more primitive, elementary aspects, which give it body and vitality. Scientific concepts, in turn, supply structures for the upward development of the child's spontaneuous concepts towards consciousness and deliberate use. Scientific concepts grow downward through spontaneous concepts; spontaneous concepts grow upward through scientific concepts.

In terms of extensive reading, this may be interpreted as an argument in favour of extensive reading ('everyday reading') as the necessary base for academic reading ('scientific reading'), where practise of, and training in, multi-level skills with extensive reading creates potentially strong and responsive pathways for the successful development of reading skills in academic text. Further, such a line of thinking maps closely on to recent second language research (Casanave: 1988, Grabe: 1991 and Block: 1992), who in different ways argue that an exclusive conceptual focus on content and formal schemata as a means for understanding the reading process risks providing teachers and learners with an excessively static view of what reading involves. Rather, the current model of reading in a foreign language is also multi-level and dynamic, as Grabe (1991: 383) notes:

In general, the term interactive approaches can refer to two different conceptions. First it can refer to the general interaction which takes place between the reader and the text. The basic concept is that the reader (re)constructs the text information based in part on the knowledge drawn from the text and in part from the prior knowledge available to the reader ...Second , the term interactive approaches refers to the interaction of many component skills potentially in simultaneous operation; the interaction of these cognitive skills leads to fluent reading comprehension... These two perspectives are complementary, though discussions in the literature tend to stress one perspective over the other, or to ignore one of the two perspectives altogether. In fact, most cognitive psychologists and education psychologists stress the interaction-of-skills arrays; in contrast, most second language researchers stress the interaction between the reader and the text.

The question then arises: how can a teacher help students to walk the tightrope between these different levels so as to have optimal access to all modes of interpretation? Or, in the more specific terms of reference of this paper, how can an extensive reading course using graded readers in the first term be developed towards academic text by the end of the third term? For reasons of space, let us briefly outline some possibilities in the next section.

9.0 Towards reading academic text

One way to approach this is to re-consider the reading tasks made of the learner faced with authentic text: the more difficult the text, the simpler the task, in short. How? In the first five weeks of the second term, the students are required to use a different extensive reading library; this consists of a set of 'How to' books, and includes titles such as How to Cook Italian Food, How to Take Colour Photographs, How to Stay Young, and so on. Originally produced for a native speaker general audience, these books are written in an easy-to-read manner.

Each week, the students choose a different book, and read it within certain limits: twenty pages in total, and not all pages to be consecutive, so they must choose a few pages here and there from different parts of the book according to their interests. Why? One indirect lesson that students learn with graded readers is to read through the book cover to cover. But in terms of independent reading, most people never actually finish a book: we usually read selectively rather than every last page. To do this, the students naturally need to be guided to make use of the table of contents, the index, and skimming skills. Furthermore, before the students select what they are going to read, they are asked to write down what they know of the topic so as to activate their real-world knowledge. While reading, the students are asked to focus on the main ideas by reading the first sentence only of each paragraph on their initial reading and keep notes in their reading journal; then, through subsequent readings and underlining of two to three phrases in each paragraph, they are required to create a mind map of the key points. In class, they then use their notes and mind maps as a basis for pair discussions, and write a summary of their discussion.

In the second half of the second term, students are asked each week to find an English newspaper article (12) of personal interest to them (between 300 and 500 words long) to prepare it in the following way before class. First, they cut it out and stick in their reading journal. Next, they read through the article to find answers to these cues: who? what? when? where? how? Third, they are to choose no more than six key phrases from the text; to copy these into their journals; to use their dictionaries to write paraphrases in English. Then, they are required to write a summary of the main points, and to finish this with their personal comments about the topic. Again, in class, they use their notes and summaries to give mini-presentations in pairs as a basis for discussion and for explaining key vocabulary to each other.

In the initial few weeks of the third term, students can be trained in lexical analysis of text where the goal is to identify the lexical relationships of equivalence, opposition and inclusion (McCarthy:1988) across two pages of expository text. Equivalence here means phrases which in the discourse realise the same locally instantiated meaning value with each other; opposition refers to phrases in the discourse which realise the opposite locally instantiated meaning value with each other; inclusive alludes to phrases in the discourse that operate in a general-detail relationship towards each other. In such a lexical analysis, the reader becomes a discourse analyst; and since the relationships are operating across long stretches of discourse (multi-paragraph), the analysis is simultaneously operating at both specific-local and general-global levels. (See Hoey (1993) for detailed analysis of how text operates lexically.)

In the final phase of the third term, students then apply everything that has gone before when they are asked to choose books from their own major; to read twenty non-consecutive pages; to prepare mind maps; to perform lexical analysis; to write a response summary; to present and discuss the contents of the book in pairs; to write a final self-assessment.

10.0 Conclusion

This paper has discussed options, problems and solutions in the organisation of a first-year extensive reading course. First, this analysis has argued that graded readers should form the initial core of a first-year reading course in order to raise reading confidence and fluency in students so that they can be prepared both to tackle higher level text and to develop more effective reading strategies later in the year. Research in the field supports this argument both in terms of reading development (Hill:1992; Huckin et al: 1993), and in terms of core vocabulary development (Nation: 1990). Second, this analysis has argued that an exclusive focus on the extensive reading of narrative text, though necessary and effective as a primary base, is however insufficient through the rest of the year. Attention also needs to be paid to the optimal simultaneous development of extensive reading and vocabulary with general readership expository text. Here, this paper has identified strategic lexical analysis and idea mapping as the key entry points. Further work remains, though, in investigating more finely the critical interface between extensive reading and 'sub-technical' core vocabulary - and the interesting choices that learners can make in moving from graded to authentic text.

Notes

1. Extensive reading library used specifically with Art and Design B 1993, Art and Design A 1994, 1995, 1996. Whole-class graded readers used as core content with Medical B 1996 (Love Story) for oral communication; with Bio-Resources A 1996 (Frankenstein) for writing; with International Studies A 1996 for writing (Cry Freedom). Variations on the lexical analysis approach mentioned later in this paper used with International Relations C 1995 for writing, and other classes in previous years, and being employed with 1996 reading and writing classes in second and third terms.

2. Until 1996, I used the library ticket system, but found this administratively cumbersome. The reading record sheet is more individualised, and provides an easily accessible update each week for both students and teacher.

3. Since I was off sick for three weeks in April/May 1996, and the students were unable to use the class library during this period, the total was reduced to 600 for the 1996 summer term. See Robb and Susser (1989), Kitao et al. (1990) and Day et al. (1991) for different extensive reading targets used at the university level in Japan.

4. This also provides a quick and unobtrusive means to check attendance. As regards loss of books, which is sometimes cited as a problem with extensive reading libraries, I've only lost one or two titles a year with each class. However, if you have a number of repeating students at the start of the year, some of them are more likely to 'disappear' - along with the books that they have checked out.

5.I came across this idea on the Fluency First internet discussion list run on TESL-L from the City University of New York where the emphasis was on writing skills. Simple and elegant, it lends itself to flexible variations according to local needs and context.

6. See note 3 for reasons why the reading total is lower than 750 pages.

7. Of some interest here is the fact that Weinstein's Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI), a standardised psychological test that assesses learners' thought processes, behaviours and study techniques, includes time management as one of its ten subscales (Weinstein et al.: 1988). The other LASSI subscales are attitude, motivation, anxiety, concentration, information processing, selecting main ideas, study aids, self testing and test strategies. See Puntambekar (1995) for a description of how LASSI was used to help design an intelligent tutoring system that aimed to improve proficiency in metacognition for L1 teenagers.

8. See note 3 for reasons why there were no support tutorials for these students in the 1996 summer term. In contrast, support tutorials in the 1995 summer term enabled ten or so students to organise their reading so as to reach the term goal of 750 pages. Refer to 6.0 Student Documentation, Mid-term reports, for a brief explanation of such tutorials.

9. The focus would at this stage be on characteristic narrative structuring as a support for global prediction skills and for post-reading summary writing. See Carrell (1992) for using written recalls to assess formal and content schemata awareness.

10. Similar conclusions have been noted on the TESL-L Fluency First internet discussion list.

11.Vygotsky proposes five basic types of complexes, or concrete groupings of objects by 'factual' - as opposed to abstract-logical - connections: (i) associative complexes (ii) collections (iii) chain complexes (iv) diffuse complexes (v) pseudoconcepts; he argues that complexes act as one foundation of mature 'scientific' concept formation: 'The principal function of complexes is to establish bonds and relations. Complex thinking begins the unification of scattered impressions; by organizing discrete elements of experience into groups, it creates a basis for later generalizations. But the advanced concept presupposes more than unification. To form such a concept it is also necessary to abstract, to single out elements, and to view the abstracted elements apart from the totality of the concrete experience in which they are embedded. In genuine concept formation, it is equally important to unite and to separate... '(Vygotsky (1934): 135-136).

12. One problem, noted by Kyongho and Nation (1989), with one-off unrelated stories is the low repetition rate of vocabulary outside the 2,000 most frequent items. They recommend using running newspaper stories instead; this in turn raises the problem of students knowing which stories are going to run over more than one week if the emphasis is on (a) student selection of reading material and (b) practice of vocabulary learning skills, as it is here in the second term.


Bibliography

Block, E.L. 1992. 'See how they read: comprehension monitoring of L1 and L2 readers.' TESOL Quarterly 26:2, 319 - 343.

Brumfit, C.J. 1980. Problems and principles in English teaching . Oxford: Pergamon Press.

Brumfit, C.J. 1984. Communicative methodology in language teaching . Cambridge: CUP.

Carrell, P.L., Devine, J. and Eskey, D.E. (eds.) 1988. Interactive approaches to second language reading . Cambridge: CUP.

Carrell, P.L. 1992. 'Awareness of text structure: effects on recall.' Language Learning 42:1 1 - 19.

Carter, R. and McCarthy, M. (eds.) 1988. Vocabulary and language teachin g. London: Longman.

Casanave, C.P. 1988. 'Comprehension monitoring in ESL reading: a neglected essential.' TESOL Quarterly 22:2, 283 - 302.

Day, R.R., Omura, C. and Hirmatsu, M. 1991. 'Incidental EFL vocabulary learning and reading.' Reading in a Foreign Language 7:2, 541 - 552.

Day, R.R. (ed.) 1993. New ways in teaching reading . Virginia: TESOL Inc.

Grabe, W. 1991. 'Current developments in second language reading research.' TESOL Quarterly , 25:3, 375 - 406.

Greenwood, J. 1992. Class readers . Oxford: OUP.

Extensive Reading Journal Part III By Endha Blog

Evaluating Sustained Silent Reading in Reading Classes

Chow, Ping-Ha
lsp-phch [at] lsp.hkcampus.net
Po Leung Kuk Lee Shing Pik College (Hong-Kong, China)

Chou, Chi-Ting
ct899 [at] yahoo.com
Deh-Yu College of Nursing and Management (Taiwan)

A literature review on the effects of incorporating sustained silent reading (SSR) in class was given and the key features of successful SSR were examined. A general assumption about reading is that students improve their reading ability by reading a lot. Research on native speakers of English and students of English as a second language has shown that the amount of time spent reading is related to students' reading comprehension and vobabulary growth. Students also develop more positive attitudes towards reading after the SSR programs. The effects are more prominent when the students are allowed to select their own reading materials and the SSR programs are run for 6 months or more.

Introduction

A Sustained Silent Reading (SSR) program has been implemented in schools through the Hong Kong Extensive Reading Scheme in English, which has been initiated and developed by the Education Department for 10 years. The aim of the SSR is to help students develop a good habit of reading and improve their English proficiency in the long run. In sustained silent reading, students read silently in a designated time period every day in school. They select their own reading material and are not asked to answer comprehension questions or write book reports. SSR is nothing new. The term Uninterrupted Sustained Silent Reading was introduced as early as 1960. McCracken (1971) set forth some basic rules for initiating SSR. Since then, it has been implemented in reading classes at all grade levels. According to several research studies, effects of SSR on students' reading include improvement in reading skills and vocabulary acquisition, as measured by reading test scores, developing a positive attitude towards reading and cultivating a better reading habit.

Gains in Achievment

The study of Nagy, Herman & Anderson (1985) investigated whether students acquire measurable knowledge about unfamiliar words while reading natural text. Subjects were 57 eighth grade students of average and above average reading ability. They were given individual interview and a multiple choice test. The results suggest that a moderate amount of reading will lead to substantial vocabulary gains. Since SSR involves substantial amounts of natural reading, it is probable that this practice fosters vocabulary growth. The researchers state that the findings indicate that reading is a most effective way to produce large-scale vocabulary growth. This study supports the hypothesis that incidental learning from context during free reading is the major mode of vocabulary acquisition during the school years.

A study (Ozburn, 1995) of 60 ninth grade students in remedial classes produces similar findings. Students read a self-selected book for the first 10-15 minutes of each daily 55-minute class. They also checked the books out and were encouraged to read at home. The Gates MacGinite Reading Test was administered before the study and 9 months later. Results show that all students have improved in their reading level. In the Project READ, which includes the use of SSR, conducted in the Washington D.C. public schools, Coley (1983) reported that over the 6 month period of the project, gains in reading achievement occurred in both 7th and 8th grades. The effect of non-stop reading on improved comprehension is evident in achievement score gains(4). Compared with the control groups, students participating in the project demonstrated better reading strategies when having trouble reading a book. Coley thinks that the result of Project READ lends strong support for the inclusion of a period of non-stop reading daily.

Shifts in Attitudes

Attitude changes towards reading have also been observed. Attitude shifts occurred in both attitude towards reading and attitude towards paperback books for students in Project READ(5). Ozburn (1995) reported that the students checked out over 2000 books during SSR program. Wiesendanger and Birlem (1984) noted that nine of the eleven research studies they analyzed presented evidence that students develop more positive attitudes towards reading in schools with SSR. Valeri-Gold (1995) incorporated SSR in her reading classes and found that the majority of students felt that SSR had a positive influence on their attitudes about reading. They had read a lot more since SSR was implemented into their reading classes.

A survey by Wiesendanger & Bader (1989) investigated what happened after the termination of SSR. They monitored the summer reading habits of both students who had, and those who has not been exposed to SSR during the previous school year. Results of the survey show students who had participated during the academic year in a reading program that incorporated SSR read considerably more during the following summer than did those who had not been part of the SSR program. This survey indicates that SSR can affect the reading habits of students even after they have completed the program. It has also been found that SSR has the greatest positive effect on students of average reading ability.

Providing a Better Knwoledge Base

In addition to gains in achievement and shift in attitude, Grubaugh points out that the kind of wide reading that students engage in during SSR should broaden their background of information, thus providing them with a better knowledge base with which to relate to their subject area textbooks and lectures. SSR readers may solve some of their own problems by reading books about kids their own age who are faced with the problems of growing up. Grubaugh stresses that student will learn that reading is more than completing worksheets or memorizing sight words. They learn that reading is laughing, crying, adventuring, exploring, or finding out how to do things. Students will discover reading as a worthwhile pastime and begin to develop an appreciation of the magic of books (170). Fielding et al. agree that reading the wide range of topics in trade books can provide insights into different kind of people, interpersonal relationships, and moral dilemmas that can be difficult to learn from real life.

Does SSR Really Work?

Thousands of students after six or more months of SSR were asked about their reaction to it (McCracken):

Students say they like SSR because it is quiet, with many indicating it is the only quite time in their entire day. All kinds of students have responded that they learned to like to readcPoor readers responded that since no one watches them they can make mistakes without worrying. Able readers say that they are relieved because they don't have to prove that they are bright every time they read something. All respond that they like SSR because they can read what they want to read (582).

Despite a number of advocates who affirm that SSR works, there are studies which show that SSR makes no significant difference on reading comprehension or it has a negative effect. Dwyer & Reed (1989) conducted a study to investigate the attitudes towards reading of students engaging in SSR. There were 19 fourth and fifth graders in the experimental group and 21 fifth graders in the control group. The experimental group engaged in 15 minutes SSR and the control group had 20 minutes more instructional time in regular reading program. The findings reveal that the experimental group demonstrated an overall drop of nearly 2 points on the attitude scale. The experimental girls gained slightly. There have been no substantial differences in any of the control group pre and post attitude scores. The results seem consistent with findings of a survey by Herbert, (1987) who distributed an attitude survey to 636 students from 7th to 9th grades in a suburban junior high school. Students' responses were largely negative towards SSR. Students did not like it and did not feel it improved their reading skills (651).

It seems that more studies in this area are needed. However, it has to be noted that in Dwyer & Reed's study, both experimental and control groups were using the same basal reading series. Even though students were engaged in SSR, they were not reading books of their own choice, and the sample in the study was small. In Herbert's survey, not much background information is given. It is known that students spent 12 minutes a day 4 or 5 days a week in SSR and they responded anonymously to the survey. In their overview of the research on the effectiveness of SSR, Wiesendanger & Birlem conclude that while effect of SSR on word recognition and reading comprehension appears inconclusive, the relationship between SSR and positive reading attitudes seems clearly established in most studies. They add that "when analyzing the results of long term studies, it is evident that the findings are skewed in favor of SSR" (197). It would prove worthwhile to look into factors that can be attributed to the failure or success of SSR.

Key Elements of Successful SSR

Teacher as a Role Model

Campbell argues that what the teacher does during and after the reading time is crucial. Teachers have the opportunity to demonstrate their interest in and enjoyment of reading by providing a role model of silent reading (179). In order for SSR to be a success, the teacher has to read and modeling does not finish at the end of the silent reading period. Campbell suggests that teachers should comment upon, talk about books they read. Students in class will become eager to do the same. When Valeri-Gold implemented SSR, she brought in several books that she had read over the summer and the latest book she was reading. She told the students why she had selected these books and why she loved to read. She believes that it will help motivate students to select books to read, promote a love for reading and assess who she is as a reader.

A Long Term Project

In reviewing the studies on SSR, Wiesendanger & Birlem observe that four of the five studies conducted for 5 months or less reported that SSR did not improve reading comprehension or word recognition. However, the studies engaging in SSR had achieved significantly better results in reading achievement (199). This observation prompts them to query whether it is possible that the effects of SSR on reading comprehension and word recognition are more likely to be evident only after a period of at least 6 months. From her experience of implementing a successful high school SSR program, Ozburn agrees with Krashen that it will take over 4 months for an SSR program to show results (5). She points out that the time may be longer. It takes many students 4 or 5 months to become hooked on books.

Availability of Materials on a Wide Range of Topics and Readability

The limitation of basal readers leads to the support for using trade books as reading materials for students (Fielding et al. ; Redding). According to Redding, the advantage of using trade books is the wide variety of books available to teachers. The importance of wide variety is to ensure that each student will find a book that will interest him/her. Moreover, trade books use real language, not writing designed to fit a specified vocabulary list. Fielding et al. agree that basal readers and textbooks do not offer the same richness of vocabulary, sentence structure, or literary form as do trade books. Students who spend time reading trade books have more opportunity to unravel the intricacies of written language than students whose reading is restricted to textbooks (153). Ready access to these books is also important. Fielding et al. Remark that although good school and community libraries are a valuable resource, they cannot match the ready availability of books in classroom collections. A classroom library should become a springboard into wider reading. A teacher can build on the students' experience with the classroom library by actively encouraging them to seek books from school and public libraries (157). If possible, there should be a continuous influx of new books.

Ownership and Communities of Readers

"If we want our adolescent students to grow to appreciate literature, another first step is allowing them to exert ownership and choose the literature they will read" (Atwell 161). Allowing students to select their own reading materials will enhance students' motivation to read. McCracken states that no student, able or remedial, should be chided for reading an easy book. A student in Valeri-Gold's SSR class wrote in his journal that in the past, the only time he read was when it was required and he knew that he would be tested on the material. After participating in SSR in class, he feels differently about reading because he chooses his own book to read (336) . Allowing students to create their own ecurriculum' for reading is an important factor to promote lifelong interest in reading and for students to enjoy reading. By building a community of readers within the class, students can be provided with opportunities after SSR to share their reflections aloud with their peers for discussion and feedback (Valeri-Gold 386). Readers discuss books and what they mean to them, talk about the process of reading and see themselves as readers and interpreters of writing (Redding 6). Siblings, parents and teachers may join the community of readers. The group will talk about books they have read and get recommendation for future reading. Sharing and conferencing of reading experience will help to create a classroom environment where reading is valued.

Other Factors

There are other factors that may be instrumental in determining whether or not SSR is successful. Success of SSR may depend on the support of the principal, teachers, and other staff members in the school. Wiesendanger & Birlem support the view that the attitude of the teacher toward SSR may be very significant. Teachers' enthusiasm or lack of interest in reading is easily communicated to students. Creating a quiet, relaxing and nonevaluative classroom environment is also a key element for successful SSR.

Studies Done with ESL Students

The discussion of the effects of SSR above is based on the SSR research on native speakers of English. There are a few studies that show SSR can be useful for English as a Second Language students. In Pilgreen & Krashen's study (1993), 125 high school ESL students in grades 10 through 12 participated in SSR for 12 to 15 minutes per day and were encouraged to continue their reading at home. Results indicate that students clearly enjoyed SSR. They reported that they engaged in outside reading more and liked leisure reading better after the 16-week SSR program. Students also showed gains in the Stanford Diagnostic Reading Comprehension Test. However, there is a lack of a control group in this study. It may affect the reliability of the findings, but the results are suggestive. Another study (Petrimoulx) involved 16 foreign students from 10 countries in the International Language Institute of the University of South Florida. Students were divided into 3 groups. Two groups received no SSR, while the third group did SSR 10 minutes a day for 15 weeks. Pre and Post reading comprehension tests and vocabulary tests were administered. The target group showed reading comprehension and vocabulary gains greater than the two control groups, but the gains are too small to be considered significant from a statistical point of view. A survey in this study does reveal a high degree of acceptance of the SSR activity and an increase of at-home reading.

A study that shows significant results was conducted in India (Aranha), a school in the suburbs of Bombay that uses English as its medium of instruction. SSR was introduced twice a week in one fourth grade class. Attitudes towards reading and reading achievement of the children in the experimental class were compared to those children in a control class that used the same language program without SSR. The results of the study show a high gain in reading attitudes in the SSR group and a loss in attitude scores in the control group. Girls of the experimental SSR group showed significant improvement in achievement scores compared with girls in the control group. Aranha concludes that SSR is a suitable classroom procedure for schools in Asia and Africa since it attempts to improve students' attitudes towards reading and their achievement in reading (217).

Elley & Mangubhai emphasize the important role of high-interest story reading in second language learning. They claim that exposure of the second language is normally planned, restricted, gradual and largely artificial. The amount of exposure is also limited (54, 55). Second language learners will benefit from total immersion in the target language. To test the "Book Flood Hypothesis": exposure to large numbers of story books will have an effect on general language competence, Elley & Mangubhai conducted a study in Fiji. The findings of this study and a follow-up study a year later demonstrate that there has been great progress in English language growth in the Book Flood groups.

References

  • Aranha, M. (1985) "Sustained silent reading goes East." Reading Teacher, 39(2), 14-217.
  • Atwell, N. (1987) In the Middle. Portsmouth: Boynton/Cook.
  • Campbell, R. (1989) "The Teacher as a Role Model during Sustained Silent Reading (SSR)." Reading, 23(3), 179-183.
  • Coley, J.D. (1983) "Project READ: Observations from the Past and Implications for the Future." ERIC ED 243 363.
  • Dwyer, E.J. & Reed, V. (1989) "Effects of Sustained Silent Reading on Attitudes Toward Reading." Reading Horizons, 29(4), 283-293.
  • Elley, W. B. & Mangubhai, F. (1983) "The Impact of Reading on Second Language Learning." Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 53-67.
  • Fielding, L.G., Wilson, P. T. & Anderson, R. C. (1986) "A new focus on free reading: The role of trade books in reading instruction." The Contexts of School-Based Literacy. Ed. Raphael, T. New York: Random House.
  • Grubaugh, S. (1986) "Initiating Sustained Silent Reading in Your School." Clearing House, 60(4), 169-174.
  • Herbert, S. (1987) "SSR-What do students think?" Journal of Reading, 30, 651.
  • Hillerich, R. C. (1983) The Principal's Guide to Improving Reading Instruction. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • McCracken, R.A. (1971) "Initiating Sustained Silent Reading." Journal of Reading, 14(8), 521-524, 582-583.
  • Nagy, W.E., Herman, P.A. & Anderson, R.C. (1985) "Learning words from context." Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 233-253.
  • Ozburn, M.S. (1995) "A Successful High School Sustained Silent Reading Program." English in Texas, 26(3), 4-5.
  • Petrimoulx, J. (1988) "Sustained Silent Reading in an ESL Class: A Study." ERIC ED 301 068.
  • Pilgreen, J. & Krashen, S. (1993) "Sustained Silent Reading with English as a Second Language High School Students: Impact on Reading Comprehension, Reading Frequency, and Reading Enjoyment." School Library Media Quarterly, 22(1), 21-23.
  • Redding, D. W. (1993) "Computer Assisted Book Selection in the Reading Workshop." ERIC ED 358 417.
  • Valeri-Gold, M. (1995) "Uninterrupted Sustained Silent Reading is an Effective Authentic Method for College Developmental Learners." Journal of Reading, 38(5), 385-386.
  • Wiesendanger, K.D. & Bader, L. (1989) "SSR: Its Effects on Students' Reading Habits after They Complete the Program." Reading Horizons, 29(3), 162-166.
  • Wiesendanger, K.D. & Birlem, E.D. (1984) "The Effectiveness of SSR: An Overview of the Research." Reading Horizons, 24(3), 197-201.

Extensive Reading Journal Part II By Endha Blog

Can We Increase the Power of Reading by Adding More Output and/or Correction?

Beniko Mason and Stephen Krashen
Texas Papers in Foreign Language Education (in press)

It is firmly established that free reading leads to increased second language competence (Krashen, 1993; Elley, 1991, Mason and Krashen, 1997). A recent confirmation is Tsang (1996), who reported that EFL students in an English-medium school in Hong Kong who engaged in self-selected reading for 24 weeks made significant gains in writing (overall impression, content, and language use), but those who did extra writing did not. Tsang noted, however, that the writing was done "without teacher feedback" (p. 227). Papers were "impressionistically graded, given brief positive comments" and returned to the students (p. 217).

In this study, we assume the power of reading, and seek to determine whether output practice, with and without correction, will increase its effectiveness, as it has been suggested that increasing output and form-focus may enhance the effect of comprehensible input (e.g. Swain, 1995; Schmidt, 1995).

Method

Subjects were 104 first year female English majors, ages 18-19, in an extensive reading program in a college in Osaka, Japan. No students had been in English speaking countries, none had had extra English lessons or an English-speaking friend, and none worked in businesses that required use of English. The study was therefore done in a pure EFL situation. All were "high beginning/low intermediate" students of English (mean score of the TOEIC = 123.6 for Reading, 153.6 for Listening, out of a possible 495 for each section).

All groups engaged in extensive reading (Mason and Krashen, 1997). They were required to read about 2000 pages in two semesters (400,000 to 500,000 words), a longer duration than Tsang (1996) employed, and with far more reading. All students began reading graded readers at the lowest level, and worked up to higher levels and easy authentic reading for native young adults. Students selected books on their own according to interest and were asked to keep a record of the books they had read, pages, level of the book, and the time required to read the book. They also wrote a brief summary of each book's content and comments on their reading progress. The teacher responded with encouragement, suggestions for further reading, and answered whatever questions students had.

The three experimental groups were intact classes, and their treatments were those desired by the students themselves, based on how classes reacted to the summary writing assignment:

Group 1 ("Japanese"; n = 34) did not want to spend time writing summaries of they read; they only wrote very brief summaries in Japanese just to confirm that they had done the reading.

Group 2 ("English"; n = 34) wrote a summary, In English, for each book they read.

Group 3 ("English/correction"; n = 36) wrote a summary in English for each book they read. The summaries were corrected by a native speaker of English and rewritten by the students. Feedback was focused on the completeness of the summary as well as a few grammatical errors, eg. the third person singular, articles, and tenses. Correction was done eight times each semester.

The following measures were used:

  1. A 100 item Cloze test, written at the grade 6 level (reliability r = .86). The same test was used as a pretest (April, 1996) and posttest (December, 1996).
  2. A Writing sample: Subjects read a short story about 2000 words long, which took them about 30 minutes. They were then asked to write a summary immediately afterwards, without looking back at the story, which also took about 30 minutes. Different stories were used for the pre- and posttests: The story used for the pretest was easier, written at the 600 word level, while the story used for the posttest was at the 1600 word level. Four aspects of the writing samples were analyzed:

(1) The total number of words written,
(2) the total number of clauses written,
(3) the total number of error-free clauses, as determined by the agreement of two raters, and
(4) the total number of words in error-free clauses. Measures (3) and (4) have been found to be especially appropriate for writers at this level (Ishikawa, 1995). The writing pretest was given in April, 1996 and the posttest in January, 1997.

Results

Table 1. Results (adjusted means)

Group

cloze
test

total
words

total
clauses

error-free
clauses

wds in
error-free
clauses

Japanese

37.7

225.9

44.5

28.9

125.6

English

39.1

193.8

36.7

20.9

102.2

Eng/corr

40.4

206.1

39.2

22.6

111.2

Table 1 presents post-test means, adjusted for pretest scores for that measure. Application of ANCOVA revealed no significant difference among the groups for the cloze test (F = 1.45, df = 2,92, p = .24). Differences on the writing measure were, however, significant or very close to significant (total words; F = 3.02, p = .05; total clauses, F = 5.20, p = .007; error-free clauses, F = 4.89, p = .009; words in error-free clauses, F = 2.80, p =.065).

Follow-up tests (Fisher LSD) were performed for all writing measures. In every case, the Japanese group and English/correction group significantly outperformed the English group (p < .001). Differences between the Japanese group and English/correction group were not significant.

It must be noted, however, that there was extreme variation in pretest writing measures. Even with the use of ANCOVA, this makes interpretation difficult. As presented in table 2, the English/correction group was much more fluent on the pretest, producing more words and clauses. Note that the Japanese group caught up to them and even surpassed them on the writing measures; differences, however, were not significant, as noted above, using ANCOVA. There was little difference among the groups on the cloze pretest.

Table 2. Pretest and Postest Raw Scores

Cloze

Total Words

Pre

Post

Pre

Post

Japanese

30.5 (7.7)

38.7 (7.1)

109.0 (45.7)

227.3 (67.2)

English

28.9 (8.1)

39.2 (6.9)

71.6 (34.3)

179.7 (39.1)

English/corr

27.0 (8.6)

39.4 (9.3)

172.8 (86.6)

222.9 (59.8)

Total Clauses

Error-free Clauses

Pre

Post

Pre

Post

Japanese

21.7 (9.8)

43.7 (12.3)

10.1 (5.8)

26.6 (9.9)

English

13.8 (6.8)

34.1 (7.8)

6.1 (4.6)

19.0 (6.4)

English/corr

34.6 (18.2)

42.2 (11.5)

16.7 (10.5)

24.8 (9.0)

Words in Error-free Clauses

pre

post

Japanese

46.0 (26.3)

123.8 (48.3)

English

29.0 (21.2)

92.6 (32.4)

English/corr

75.2 (49.5)

122.6 (48.1)

Standard deviations in parentheses.

Another way of analyzing the results is to consider efficiency. Table 3 presents the amount of time each group devoted to reading and writing in English for the extensive reading class. (All students were enrolled in 10.5 additional hours of English classes in addition to the class discussed here. These classes were the same for all students.)

Table 3. Time Devoted per Week to Reading and Writing in English

Time devoted to

Reading

Writing

Total

Japanese

3.35 (1.0)

-

3.35

English

3.7 (1.4)

2.2 (.82)

5.9

English/corr

4.4 (1.6)

2.0 (1.2)

6.4

writing = extra time writing in English.

The Japanese group spent slightly less time reading, and spent far less time than the other groups overall. We estimate that for the entire academic year, the Japanese group invested about 100 hours in English, while the English group spent 180 hours and the English/correction group about 200 hours. Thus, the Japanese group got approximately the same results for about one-half the investment in time.

There was no difference among the groups for the amount read (table 4). All groups declined in the second semester, and none of the groups attained the goal of 2000 pages.

Table 4. Quantity of Reading

Amount Read

First Sem.

Second Sem.

Japanese

965.1 (364.3)

591.7 (297.1)

English

912.9 (161.8)

459.8 (268.5)

English/corr

954.1 (156.8)

572.4 (199.1)

Conclusions

There was no obvious effect of adding additional output in English or output with correction.Reading alone produced the same results, and was far more time-efficient. This result is consistent with the input hypothesis, but inconsistent with output and instruction hypotheses.

Possible objections to this conclusion include the following:

  1. Subjects may not have written enough to make a difference. This is doubtful, because subjects in the writing groups invested about 1/3 the total time in writing.
  2. Subjects may not have had enough error correction. This is possible, but our results agree with those of other studies showing no or very little effect even after substantial amounts of correction (Krashen, 1994).
  3. The same person taught all three sections (B.M.) and may have been biased toward one approach. The reading and writing, however, was done at home, and the corrections for the English/correction group were done by someone else.

It also may be the case that the English/correction group was more enthusiastic than the others: They requested correction and wrote far more on the pretest. While they outperformed the English group, it is interesting that they did not do better than those who only wrote in Japanese. A surprising result, however, is that the English/correction group did not suffer in terms of fluency when compared to the English group. Correction thus seemed to have no ill effects, even though it did not help.

Acknowledgments

We thank Mr. Julian Upton for his help in correcting student papers and Miss Mayumi Yamashita for help in calculations.

References

Elley, W. (1991). Acquiring literacy in a second language: The effect of book-based programs. Language Learning, 41, 375-411.

Ishikawa, S. (1995). Objective measurement of low-proficiency EFL narrative writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4, 51-69.

Krashen, S. (1993). The Power of Reading. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.

Krashen, S. (1994). The input hypothesis and its rivals. In N. Ellis (Ed.)

Implicit and Explicit Learning of Languages (pp. 45-77). London: Academic Press.

Mason, B. and Krashen, S. (1997). Extensive reading in English as a foreign language. System, 25, 91-102.

Schmidt, R. (Ed.) (1995). Attention and Awareness in Foreign Language Learning. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In Cook, G. and Seidelhofer, B. (Eds.) Principle and Practice in Applied Linguistics: Studies in Honor of H.G. Widdowson (pp. 125-144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Tsang, W.K. (1996). Comparing the effects of reading and writing on writing performance. Applied Linguistics, 17, 210-233.